Aggravated by Appropriation
The Dangers of Cultural Appropriation
December 5, 2014
It was November 6 in my American Government class that I realized how many of us are ignorant of the ill-nature of cultural appropriation. I am always itching for a conversation about social issues, particularly social issues people of color are faced with in America and beyond. Naturally, after we completed notes, I raised my hand and asked Mr. Meyer if we could discuss cultural appropriation. Turns out, my class did not know what cultural appropriation was. After explaining it to them, and citing Miley Cyrus twerking as an example (as explained by Nadra Kareem Nittle), I received great backlash. One boy sad, “Twerking is American culture.” I responded with, “No, twerking is an appropriated form of African dances.” I then went on to explain how the cultures of people of color (those of non-European descent) are appropriated in American society. A white student in my class then said, “We’re people of color too. Look at us, we aren’t clear.” …I just stared at him.
The term cultural appropriation refers to the process by which elements of a marginalized culture (typically that of POC, or people of color) are borrowed, or appropriated, by a non-marginalized, privileged group.
Simply put, cultural appropriation is when the culture of a group treated as inferior is stolen by a group regarded as superior.
On many occasions, Miley has appropriated the culture of black people. Even though twerking is seen by some as American culture, by definition, Miley Cyrus twerking is cultural appropriation.
The ubiquity of twerking in pop culture is undeniable. We are inundated with images of gyrating body parts. These images, however, are a misappropriation of twerking and its true derivations.
The word ‘twerk’ can be traced back about twenty years. It was first, to our knowledge, used during the 90s in the underground bounce scene located in New Orleans. The form of dance can be traced back to West African traditional dancing – most notably the dance of Mapouka, which is colloquially known as ‘the dance of the behind.’ This originated from Cote d’ Ivoire.
This is cultural appropriation. What was once a non-sexual, culturally symbolic Afrocentric dance has been appropriated, sexualized, and resultantly fetisized by Eurocentric media, culture, and advocates. Miley Cyrus has appropriated an element of black culture, and because of her white privilege, she does not have to deal with the stigma placed on young women of color in America due to twerking.
Miley Cyrus is a paragon for cultural appropriation.
Iggy Azalea is another celebrity contributing to the pervasiveness of cultural appropriation. Australian rapper and urban poster girl (read: white girl who has appropriated black and Indian culture and has subsequently labeled herself urban and has resultantly been credited with being ‘edgy’ and ‘original’), Azalea has infiltrated pop culture, beginning with her summer hit, Fancy. My disdain for Iggy was first born when I heard the intro to Fancy:
“First things first I’m the realest, realest.”
Donning a poor ‘blaccent’ along with black slang, I knew Azalea would be another celebrity capitalizing on a mixture of white privilege and appropriation of the cultures of people of color. With the release of her single, Bounce, came a grimace and eye roll on my part. Laden with a poor depiction of Indian culture, Azalea had done it again in her video. She had appropriated, or rather, misappropriated a marginalized people with no show of contrition after her transgression was brought to her attention.
Shot in India, the video featured Iggy covered in traditional Indian dress, complete with a sari and bindi. She is surrounded by Indian women as backup dancers. Just these two components of the video are controversial. What makes it worse is the song has nothing to do with Indian culture, its deep history, or former oppression. The lyrics automatically shoot down the argument that Iggy was paying homage to India. She isn’t. She dismantled Indian culture, clothed herself in ‘trendy’ elements, and discarded the stigma and struggles Indians face.
Cultural appropriation can occur on many scales and points on the gamut. The most ubiquitous, of course, is that in pop culture the most minuscule is your average person wearing a bindi or African head wrap. Appropriation becomes problematic, though, when it is trivialized and normalized.
Iggy Azalea and Miley Cyrus, like many white mainstream ‘artists,’ use a combination of their white privilege and the appropriation of people of color’s cultures to propel themselves to fame. This leaves the people of color ravaged and without the cultural credit they deserve. Borrowing characteristics of a culture and wearing the stolen characteristics under the limelight wrongly depicts a people and who they are, while the dominant people are credited with being innovative or trendy (Nittle). This oppresses and marginalizes the minority group.
In a majority of the instances of cultural appropriation, the result of the culture hijacking leaves the people of color feeling oppressed (rightfully so), while the non-minority walk free of stigma. Too often, this contributes to and upholds white privilege and supremacy. Racism is a systematic oppression of non-whites through cultural ‘norms,’ representation in the media, and government legislature.
Cultural appropriation has the potential to be racist.
I’m tired of cultural appropriation. I’m tired of my people being tired of cultural appropriation. I stand in solidarity with all people of color when I say this. Our cultures are not a trend. Miley Cyrus and Iggy Azalea, get out of hip hop and ditch your poor ‘blaccents.’ Those in my government, stop defending appropriation. Katy Perry, don’t dress up as a geisha. It’s a poor attempt, should I even call it an attempt, at honoring Asian culture. No more dressing up as Native Americans for Halloween. We are not a costume. We are a people who have transcended years of trials and oppression to earn our space in society. Our culture is what binds us to our roots. You are not permitted to pick and choose pieces of us you find trendy. You are not allowed to combine those pieces with your own to further your privilege and supremacy. Putatively, it’s racist, and we are tired. No more appropriation.
Sam Blizzard • Dec 10, 2014 at 1:34 pm
Why focus on the fact that you cannot be racist, when anything you say or do against a race or culture can be just as hurtful, biased, unnecessary, and wrong? The label of “racism” versus plain “discrimination” or “bigotry” is irrelevant if the actions are comparably terrible.
I also disagree with your telling Miley and Iggy to “get out of hip-hop.” This is unnecessary because white artists can be in hip-hop without appropriating culture.
I’m guessing you will disagree with us, but if you truly care about making the issue of cultural appropriation widely-known and acknowledged as legitimate, you would not be so antagonistic to readers you wish to educate. The proverb “you catch more flies with honey than vinegar” applies here. Jaylin Paschal wrote a very good article on white privilege on her blog (which I cannot link to because it is blocked at school, but is located at xcreativeliberation.blogspot.com) which educates readers without being accusatory or making readers feel bad or angry. People who read that post will not react in anger or denial against what she is saying, but will walk away understanding more about the realities of white privilege. Although you are entitled to anger or frustration, showing that in your writing will in fact hurt the cause you portray yourself as advocating.
I am not saying that because that is how I reacted, but how I have seen countless students react. If you examine how people have talked about this article, you will see that people have ignored the substance of your post because of the tone you take. Yes, controversy of the article has gotten people to talk about it , but is not getting anybody to agree with you or understand your points, which I believe is the point of writing an editorial.
Helena Jenkins • Dec 10, 2014 at 10:28 pm
I agree with Sam. The tone in this article is fairly angry, and I can see why. The whole idea of stealing someone’s culture and fetishizing/misusing it is rage-inducing. And while I agree that the tone put some people off, I feel that the real reason many are irritated by this article is it makes them think. This is not an attack on reader’s intelligence, but their too-strongly-held opinions. No one likes the examples used, because in an effort to use examples we would all recognize, Alex forced people to consider the problematic sides to their favorite musicians. Rather than thoughtfully considering the article, and deciding to what degree cultural appropriation is an issue for them, readers were offended by the tone and examples and immediately took the absolute opposite view of the issue. This is an example of the larger problem people have with considering racism. When accused of racism, nearly everyone in this day and age insists they have no part in it. The problem is, racism isn’t a light switch, like you’re either Jesus or a Nazi. No-one is perfect, but because people become so defensive when accused of a form of racism, they never change their behavior or have a frank discussion about their actions. People in this day and age still have plenty of bigoted opinions, and need to have an open discussion about them, without getting defensive. If someone tells you you’re being ____-ist, listen because they are probably right. And if you disagree with them, okay, but at least you had a conversation in the first place.
Sam Blizzard • Dec 11, 2014 at 11:22 am
To be clear, i think the article is both effective and ineffective: effective because people are talking about it; whether they agree or not with what you say, they are talking about it and are aware of what cultural appropriation is, which is great. However, I think it is ineffective because, in what I have seen with other students, the focus has been drawn to the author and not the arguments and explanations given within the article. This, I think, is jointly caused by the ignorance of the audience and the tone of the author.
Meghan • Dec 10, 2014 at 1:23 pm
I think a lot of this article could have been refined or deleted, and the core message of what cultural appropriation is, and that it is problematic, could have been expressed without all of this controversy. For instance, claiming that black people (or any race) cannot be racist is wrong. Additionally, some of the examples weren’t fully fleshed out, or could have been replaced with more universal or better examples.
However, the sheer hate I’ve heard around the school needs to stop. “I’ll kill this girl” is NOT an acceptable way to respond in disgreement. Additionally, though I see how it was misinterpreted in this way, Alex is not saying that appreciating or mixing cultures is inherently wrong – or, even if I’m mistaken and that’s exactly what she means, that’s not what cultural appropriation is supposed to be about.
Helena Jenkins • Dec 10, 2014 at 10:35 am
Okay, a lot of people seem to have a lot of varying opinions, and I’m not sure why I think it will help anything, but here’s mine. This article is very strongly worded, and introduces a concept many won’t have considered before, which seems to have triggered a lot of anger against the author. I do think that not enough distinction was made between cultural appropriation that steals something with a connotation in a culture, such as a Native American headdress, and a part of culture that has no connotation, such as a Sari. However, cultural appropriation is an issue. Many seem to dislike the possibility that they could have appropriated a culture or contributed to systemic racism, so they seem to want to discredit the notion. We all have privilege: white, straight, cis, able-bodied, neuro-typical- all of these are majority groups that provide an advantage in our society. Note that in other countries, the majority race isn’t neccesarily white. POC can be racist against “white people”, but not in America where endemic racism has been here for 200+ years. Here, if someone of a minority says something you don’t like, pay attention, because it might just be something you don’t want to hear, but need to. Please, if this is the first time you have heard of cultural appropriation, go read more about it! We all need to educate ourselves about controversial topics. Also, if this overarching idea of privilege is new to you, go find articles about it. Feel free to email me if you want to debate this further.
Jacky Maggard • Dec 10, 2014 at 10:08 am
Nicki Minaj. That’s all I’m going to say.
Shelby Mills • Dec 10, 2014 at 9:21 am
Okay, so you say you are a person that practices Hinduism, my mom and I know quiet a lot about Hindu and everything you say in this article goes against the religion! Hindu’s believe in peace and spreading culture through out the world,an example is when Gandhi tried to spread peace between the Muslims and Hindu people not to separate them but to bring them together and make them one culture, and you are saying that every culture should stay in it’s origins. America is a MELTING POT of cultures we have not stolen it, we have had every different type of culture, religion and life styles in America, we were founded on different types of people! Our country was formed on the mixing of cultures, so you saying this tells everyone who reads this that you didn’t pay attention in history class which put peoples good tax money to waste!
Jesse Beinkampen • Dec 9, 2014 at 2:21 pm
The belief that racism is a selective action and that only certain people are capable of it is simply ignorant. Whether you conform to it or not, religion and culture is a beautiful thing and everyone is entitled to express it. I don’t understand why she is so against this. Iggy and Miley are performers, they’re paid to do those things. And why? Because it’s publicity. It’s visuals. It’s life. It’s not an insult to the culture, it’s a freedom of expression. Please provide a more compelling argument next time.
Jakob Glass • Dec 9, 2014 at 9:15 am
One last comment from me. Racial and cultural appropriation is a thing, but Alexandria chose the worst examples possible, and did not give a very compelling arguement. A better example that could have been used for examples of appropriation would be the wearing of Catholic rosaries. In Catholicism, a rosary is used in a form of meditative prayer, and the rosary is an ancient and sacred artifact of the religion. In today’s modern age, you will find many people wearing rosaries as necklaces because they think that they are fashionable. I myself am not Catholic, but much of my family and people I know are, and they take slight offense when they see someone wearing a rosary. However, they do not get infuriated by this and go complaining on a blog site. No, instead they go on with their day, knowing that that person is not wearing the rosary to purposefully insult someone’s religion.
Moral of the story is, most cases of racial and cultural appropriation are born from simple misunderstandings, and lack of knowledge. No one goes out twerking with the purpose of down grading another culture, nor does someone wearing a rosary intend to insult a religion. They don’t know much about what they are doing. All they know is that they like what they are doing. And at the end of the day, is that not what is really important in life? If you accept that they simply do not know that what they are doing is insulting, then you and them can move along with your lives happily. Nobody has to throw around hurtful words, and everyone can be happy with their friends and families none the different.
If what somebody is doing makes them happy, and they are not hurting anyone, just let everyone go on being happy.
Fed • Dec 9, 2014 at 8:42 am
This article triggers me. As a child who comes from a German and Dutch family, I combine the two cultures just by living. This article is telling me that just by living, I am culturally appropriating. Alexandria, why are you against race mixing?
Luke • Dec 9, 2014 at 11:40 am
Because she got mixed up with the wrong part of tumblr,
.
Luke • Dec 9, 2014 at 7:57 am
Look, I’ve spent more time than I’d like to admit arguing against this point and the thing that it comes down to is this.
Appropriation doesn’t exist because cultures will mix and ideas transfer, especially in this age of information. SJW’s will insist that it is designed to be wholly negative, but I assure you it is meant as nothing more than spreading ethnic diversity and strengthening foreign relation.
Fed • Dec 9, 2014 at 9:13 am
>Uses “SJW”
>Links Reddit as website
SRS pls
Be more subtle next time
Luke • Dec 9, 2014 at 11:36 am
I’m being unironic. Go back to 4chan
Luke • Dec 9, 2014 at 11:41 am
Oops i mean tumblr
Erik Shelton • Dec 8, 2014 at 1:39 pm
Yes, anyone can be racist. On the other hand, Alexandria is correct in terms of taking another ones cultural and “tweaking” it or using it in a way it is not meant for is wrong in my opinion. Her stating she is against appropriation is not racist, nor saying she wants a separation of the races of our world. She is stating by what I have read from the above article, that she is solely against the misuse of racial customs and using little “snidbits” for your benefit.
Luke • Dec 9, 2014 at 8:13 am
Only problem being, there are no misuses of racial customs happening.
Matt Lucente • Dec 8, 2014 at 12:32 pm
So basically what you’re saying is any given culture should specifically and exclusively be confined to one single group, which is honestly kind of messed up. Sure, I believe that cultural appropriation is a thing, and sure, it can be a problem, but there’s a difference between me coming to school in a turban when I’m not Muslim or Indian, or simply twerking. (I mean sure, twerking is idiotic, but do you really think it became a widespread form of dance in our culture because of its African roots?). I appreciate that you’re trying to call attention to some of the seemingly big issues, but your article just feels to me like a bunch of big words like “marginalization” and “oppression” that were thrown together in an attempt to strengthen your unconvincing and bigoted argument against anyone who’s not a POC.
FURTHERMORE, racism is not something, contrary to what some may think, that is deeply ingrained in the mind of every white person ever, nor is racism confined solely to white people. Believe it or not, white people are not the only people who have oppressed others in history. White people are not the scourge of the earth. Your claim that racism is an “institutionalized form of oppression” is MAYBE only a little correct. I won’t argue that racism isn’t still prevalent, because it is and that really sucks, but to say that a black person cannot be prejudiced based on racial differences is like saying that someone who’s being attacked cannot physically retaliate against their attacker. It’s just plain incorrect.
Fed • Dec 9, 2014 at 12:35 pm
Based Matt.
Jon Ellingson • Dec 8, 2014 at 12:21 pm
So this is what the world has come to… Sad.
Scott boyd • Dec 5, 2014 at 10:12 pm
Wait…..what?
Cody Matson • Dec 5, 2014 at 3:13 pm
Ok so this article has caused all sorts of controversy. In my opinion these examples of racial appropriation are wrong these things are not rude not offensive and I have no idea of why you take it as such. This argument is entirely one sided and down right racist. America was built on the idea of a blend of cultures and this post is built on the idea that a mix of cultures is a bad thing. Which would then mean that you believe that everyone should keep to their own culture and race, which is segregation at it’s finest. You claim you are enlightened (a Hinduist belief, a different culture, the very thing you are advising against which is a form of hippocracy) but these ideas of segregation and lack of diversity are downright primitive. Thank you that is all
Alexandria Montgomery • Dec 7, 2014 at 10:33 am
…Never in my life have I claimed to be ‘enlightened’. In Hinduism, the closest thing to ‘enlightenment’ is moksha, which is Sanskrit for liberation, or mukti, which is Sanksrit for release. This liberation or release is from samsara, which is the eternal cycle of creation and destruction, or more specifically, the eternal cycle of birth, death, life, and reincarnation.
I have not attained release from samsara.
Hinduism is not a culture, it is a religion.
Hinduism is not a culture in itself, but a part of a larger culture. Me identifying as Hindu is not cultural appropriation. I am not using Hindusim as an accessory. I am Hindu because I adhere to the teachings of the Vedas, I revere Lord Shiva (a manifestation of Source, or Brahman), and I strive to attain moksha. I do not ‘claim’ to be Hindu, I AM Hindu.
Also, ‘Hinduist’ is not a word, Cody.
My argument against cultural appropriation is not racist; it is impossible for me as a young black woman to be racist, as racism is an institutionalized form of oppression. I am not an institution, and me saying cultural appropriation is wrong is not oppressing you or anyone else.
Cultural Appropriation does not promote a ‘lack of diversity’. Read the definition of culural appropriation again. And again. And let it sink in.
Robbie Spilker • Dec 7, 2014 at 6:18 pm
Racism- “The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races. Hence: prejudice and antagonism towards people of other races” as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, which means that anyone, regardless of age, race, or gender, could be racist or have racist tendencies.
Alexandria Montgomery • Dec 8, 2014 at 8:02 am
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=oxford%20dictionary%20definition%20of%20racism&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDUQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.diversityinc.com%2Fask-the-white-guy%2Fask-the-white-guy-is-the-oxford-dictionary-definition-of-racism-too-white-for-you%2F&ei=AqGFVNbYMY6-yATg74HABQ&usg=AFQjCNENzufk_tBOVwpfx-TzugJ1AQr3JA&sig2=Lle2BeiRXKhaDp3AxoxL5A&bvm=bv.80642063,d.aWw
The OED definition isn’t complete and does not totally explain what racism is.
Robbie Spilker • Dec 8, 2014 at 10:15 pm
While interesting, that article is very biased and based mostly on opinion, and using it to claim that the OED and countless other dictionaries and websites are wrong, or incomplete, seems like a stretch to me. Of course, this is just my opinion…
Markus Hardy • Dec 9, 2014 at 11:22 am
Racist thoughts alone are just that, thoughts. Preaching your racist thoughts mashes you a bigot, not a racist. Acting on thoes racist thoughts then makes you a racist. I hope she wasn’t trying to get you to understand otherwise.
Jakob Glass • Dec 8, 2014 at 8:43 am
Even if your blog post is proven to be true, you still can be racist. If you can’t be racist to white people, you still very easily can be racist to Asians, Mexicans, etc. They don’t have “white privilege ” and they have been oppressed. No matter how hard you try, you cannot say that any person is not racist. Everyone has the capacity to be racist, no matter what race they are.
Cody Matson • Dec 9, 2014 at 5:06 pm
First off I would like to apologize for not familiarizing myself with the Hindu religion. But religion is one of the main aspects of culture. Next it is entirely possible for you to be racist because the fact that you believe that you believe that you aren’t being at all racist is ignorant.
Jakob Glass • Dec 5, 2014 at 12:26 pm
In saying this, you are also saying that you are against the mixing of cultures and races. When someone reads this, the immediate thought they get is that you are asking for segregation of cultures.
Luke • Dec 9, 2014 at 1:04 pm
Which is, in essence, the point.
Fortress Maximus Topspin Groove • Dec 15, 2014 at 9:05 am
That’s what I got out of this.
Kevin Tran • Dec 5, 2014 at 10:27 am
Imitation is the highest form of flattery.