WWJD?: Offensive Terms
January 27, 2015
We avoid using offensive terms in an attempt to be decent human beings. As little kids we learned not to participate in name-calling or say bad words. (Not only because it isn’t nice, but also because it may get you punched in the face.)
As we got older, the line that divided acceptable language and “bad” words began to blur and bend. What is a “bad” word? What exactly makes a term offensive? It’s all subjective, so who decides?
The person you are talking to decides. The victim of the name-calling is the only one who can truly determine how undermining a term is. The person directly attacked by your word choice. If a term is used to describe a group in society, and that group says that term is offensive, then it is. Simply because they say it is. They are the ones dealing with the emotional and internal impact of the term, so we should take their word for it, because only they could know.
If a friend tells you something that you say (or do) is offensive, take their word for it, because only they could know.
Do not get defensive. Someone telling you that what you say is mean is not the same as someone telling you that you’re mean. No one is claiming that you’re a bad person. They’re not tearing you down, they’re just standing up for themselves.
Do not try to tell them how they should feel or react. Do not try to challenge the validity of their feelings, because you could never know the pain felt when certain words are used. One of my biggest pet peeves is when someone states that a term is offensive and someone else who uses that term frequently shouts out “no it’s not” or, worse, “well maybe you’re just too sensitive/serious.”
For example, only a gay person can comment on the true emotional impact of derogatory terms used to describe them. Anyone who does not identify as gay is in no position to determine whether or not those terms are actually hurtful. And so, if a gay friend or peer tells you that they are offended when you say something along the lines of “that’s so gay” when describing something bad, listen to them. Don’t argue that it’s not or that it’s subjective. Listen to them.
It’s quite simple, really. If a gay person tells you that something you said sounds homophobic, maybe you shouldn’t say it again. If a person of color tells you that something you said sounds racist, maybe you shouldn’t say it again.
You should obviously avoid the obvious inappropriate and hateful slurs at all costs.
We should all alter our vocabularies in a way that makes everyone around us feel accepted. You may not understand why some people are offended by some things, but you should respect their wishes regardless.
What’s important is that you eventually make amends with anyone you’ve offended. Do not just offer some insincere apology and continue to say or do the same things.
You can always argue that you have “freedom of speech” and so you can say whatever you like, and you’d be absolutely right. But you do not have freedom from the social consequences that come after you decide to be rude. Although no legal trouble may arise, you could still lose relationships and respect. So, with that being said, you should not be a jerk just because you can be a jerk.
What Would Jaylin Do? Remove any offensive words and terms from her vocabulary, apologize for being offensive, and respect the wishes of those who feel targeted.
Schlomo Sheqel • Feb 21, 2015 at 1:37 pm
Anyone who supports free speech is inherently brainwashed by the anti-Semitic media in our current education system. That’s why I support not letting students speak their mind in any environment on any school campuses. Students attend school to learn, and they have to put up with any rules that the school has to put in place to protect the sensitive groups also attending. The population of students that are privileged have no say in what is offensive to underprivileged groups. I for one promptly argue for constant monitoring of a students social media and classroom activity to make sure that they to not think or express any thoughts that may challenge any authority of school officials or damage the sensitive esteem of underprivileged groups. I can’t wait until hate-speech suppressors can directly monitor thoughts of students through greatly needed advancements in biometrics! That will be the day we can finally live in peace with everyone and anyone.
Jaylin Paschal • Feb 26, 2015 at 8:00 am
Goodbye.
Cody Shuster • Feb 26, 2015 at 11:12 am
But why should students be monitored and not the teachers? Or administration? It’s ridiculous that students are so highly restricted on everything they say or do. We’re told that we are the future of America, yet no one wants to listen to our opinions or what we have to say. You can’t restrict those that will one day be in your position. We need freedoms too. If freedom is really FREE, shouldn’t people of any race, age, or gender have it?
John • Feb 21, 2015 at 1:12 pm
Just because what I have to say offends somebody does not mean I shouldn’t say it. I should be allowed to verbally disagree with something and feel no shame for it, nor should I be prosecuted judicially for it. Did Charlie Hebdo deserve to have his office shot up and 12 of his associates murdered by Muslim extremists just because he made fun of Islam? If you say ‘yes’ to that question, YOU are the extremist. You know who persecuted people for speaking their minds? Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Muammar Gaddafi, Ali Hassan al-Majid, and Genghis Khan.
Jaylin Paschal • Feb 26, 2015 at 7:59 am
First of all, Charlie Hebdo is not a person. Charlie Hebdo is a satire magazine. They offended hundreds of people from almost every group you could think of. Does that mean that the writers and cartoonists from Charlie Hebdo deserved to die? NO. Not at all. They can say whatever they like, and SHOULD be able to without persecution. HOWEVER there ARE sometimes social consequences, if not legal ones. That’s the harsh truth. That’s what I urge you to be aware of when exercising your free speech.
John • Feb 27, 2015 at 1:24 pm
My mistake, I figured it was named after the owner. Anyway, yes there ARE sometimes social consequences but there should NEVER be legal ones. Any law that restricts my right to free speech is unconstitutional.
Jaylin Paschal • Mar 2, 2015 at 8:43 am
I did not suggest that legal consequences should arise. I was only urging readers to resist offending someone simply for the sake of offending them. Speaking your mind for the right reason-to spread the truth, knowledge, or an important message, or to speak against injustices-is encouraged. Speaking your mind for other reasons-to hurt or to spread hate- is morally wrong even if it is legally acceptable. My argument was not from a legal standpoint, but an ethical one.
Fed • Feb 11, 2015 at 10:20 am
What are these “social consequences” that people who spread hate speech get? A finger wagging? A slap on the back of the hand and a serious talking to? Does killing someone count? If so, would you support it? I support jailing and even sentencing someone to death for their rampant hate speech. Free speech allows nothing but hatred and anger to be spoken. If Nazi Germany didn’t have free speech, there’d be six million more Jews alive today.